Unit 4: Contextual Applications of Differentiation
Local Linearization
Using a tangent line to approximate function values near a point.
Prerequisites
- Related Rates
Approximating with the Tangent Line
√4 = 2 exactly, but √4.1 has no clean closed form. Before reading on: since 4.1 is so close to 4, could the tangent line to y = √x at x = 4 — a straight line, easy to evaluate anywhere — give a genuinely good estimate of √4.1?
Definition — Local Linearization
Worked Example — Approximating a Square Root
Worked Example — Approximating a Trig Value (Converting to Radians First)
Derivative Explorer
Point of tangency
f(x), with tangent line at x = a
Derivative graph — linked to the graph above; panning or zooming either moves both
What's happening at x = a
- At x = 1, f(x) ≈ -2 — the point (1, -2).
- The derivative there is f'(1) ≈ 0: the slope of the tangent line, and the instantaneous rate of change of f at this exact point.
- That slope is positive, so f is increasing at this point.
- The second derivative is positive here, so f is concave up (curving upward) near this point.
- Near x = 1, the tangent line y ≈ -2 + 0·(x − 1) is f's best straight-line approximation — the core idea a derivative captures.
Numerical derivative comparison
| h | Forward | Backward | Central |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.1 | 0.31 | -0.29 | 0.01 |
| 0.01 | 0.0301 | -0.0299 | 0.0001 |
| 0.001 | 0.003 | -0.003 | 0 |
Analysis of f(x)
- y-intercept
- (0, 0)
- x-intercepts
- (-1.73, 0), (0, 0), (1.73, 0)
- Extrema
- local max at (-1, 2); local min at (1, -2)
- Inflection points
- (0, 0)
- Vertical asymptotes
- none found in view
- Horizontal asymptotes
- none found
- Domain
- all real numbers in view
- Range (estimated)
- approximately [-970, 970]
Analysis of f'(x) — its roots are f's critical points
- y-intercept
- (0, -3)
- x-intercepts
- (-1, 0), (1, 0)
- Extrema
- local min at (0, -3)
- Inflection points
- none found in view
- Vertical asymptotes
- none found in view
- Horizontal asymptotes
- none found
- Domain
- all real numbers in view
- Range (estimated)
- approximately [-3, 297]
Tip
Common Mistakes
Using Δx in degrees directly inside a trig linearization instead of converting to radians.
f'(a) for a trig function is only correct in radians — plugging in Δx = 1 (as if it meant '1 degree') instead of π/180 radians produces a wildly wrong approximation.
Trusting a linearization far from the point of tangency without checking how far x has moved.
Linearization error grows the farther x moves from a — it's reliable very close to a, but the same tangent line can be a poor approximation even a moderate distance away, especially where the function curves sharply.
Key Takeaways
- Linearization L(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x − a) approximates f near a using its tangent line at a.
- A concave-down function's linearization overestimates nearby values; a concave-up function's linearization underestimates them, since the tangent line lies on the opposite side of the curve from its concavity.
- Trig linearizations require the input change to be in radians, since calculus derivative formulas for trig functions assume radians throughout.
Summary
Linearization approximates function values near a point. The next lesson uses that same tangent-line thinking to resolve a different kind of problem — limits that resist ordinary algebra.
Sign in to track your progress and mark this lesson complete.
Track your progress