Exponential & Logarithmic Functions
Exponential Growth & Decay
Graphing and interpreting exponential growth and decay functions.
Growing by Addition vs. Growing by Multiplication
One account earns a flat $50 every month, no matter the balance. A different account earns 5% of its current balance every month. Before reading on, predict: after many years, which account do you think ends up larger — and why might the gap between them keep growing rather than staying fixed?
Definition — Exponential Function
The flat $50 account grows linearly — additively, the same fixed amount every time. The 5% account grows exponentially — multiplicatively, and crucially, each new gain is calculated on an already-larger balance than before. That compounding effect is why exponential growth eventually overtakes any linear (or even any polynomial) growth, no matter how large the linear rate is at first: multiplicative growth builds on itself, while additive growth just keeps adding the same fixed amount forever.
Worked Example — Modeling Exponential Growth
Worked Example — Modeling Exponential Decay
Function Explorer
Transform: g(x) = a·f(b(x − h)) + k
Composition
Analysis (of the transformed function, in view)
- y-intercept
- (0, 0)
- x-intercepts
- (-9.42, 0), (-6.28, 0), (-3.14, 0), (0, 0), (3.14, 0), (6.28, 0), (9.42, 0)
- Extrema
- local min at (-7.85, -1); local max at (-4.71, 1); local min at (-1.57, -1); local max at (1.57, 1); local min at (4.71, -1); local max at (7.85, 1)
- Inflection points
- (-9.42, 0), (-6.28, 0), (-3.14, 0), (0, 0), (3.14, 0), (6.28, 0), (9.42, 0)
- Vertical asymptotes
- none found in view
- Horizontal asymptotes
- none found
- Domain
- all real numbers in view
- Range (estimated)
- approximately [-1, 1]
Tip
Common Mistakes
Using the percent rate itself as the growth factor, such as using 0.15 instead of 0.85 for a 15% decay.
A decay rate of 15% means 85% remains — the growth factor is 1 minus the decay rate (or 1 plus the growth rate for growth), not the rate itself.
Treating exponential growth as if it were the same as linear growth over long time periods, expecting a roughly constant amount of change per time step.
Exponential growth compounds — the amount of change itself grows over time, unlike linear growth's constant rate — which is why exponential functions eventually outpace linear ones by an ever-widening margin.
Key Takeaways
- Exponential functions grow or decay by a constant multiplying factor, not a constant additive amount.
- A growth factor greater than 1 models growth; between 0 and 1 models decay.
- Exponential growth compounds on itself, which is why it eventually outpaces any linear growth rate.
Summary
Exponential functions model quantities that grow or shrink multiplicatively. The next lesson asks the natural reverse question: given an exponential relationship, how do you solve for the exponent itself?
Sign in to track your progress and mark this lesson complete.
Track your progress